Recent reports about predatory offences committed by those of all ages- including men in their fifties or even in their eighties- make an important point- that age alone does not stop someone from being abusive, and these crimes are not just rare exceptions. Cases show offenders can be elderly, look respectable, be known to the family, be related to the victim, or hold trusted roles in society or the household. That makes preventing abuse harder because families often assume danger comes mainly from strangers, while many victims are hurt by people they already know. A person’s age, respected social role, religious image, or professional position does not guarantee safety. Prevention should focus on behaviour, access, power imbalances, and vulnerability – not on stereotypes about what a predator “should” look like. Society matters a great deal. Abuse spreads more easily where exploitation is tolerated, victims are not believed, institutions respond weakly, and harmful attitudes are normalised. Stopping predatory behaviour requires more than anger and condemnation. Strong words mean little unless they help build a culture of dignity, equality, child protection, digital safety, and accountability. Families, schools, workplaces, religious groups, communities, tech companies, police, courts, health services, and the media all have a role. Prevention must work at many levels. Victims cannot be asked to carry the whole burden of safety. Experts in clinical and forensic psychology divide prevention into three parts. Primary prevention stops abuse before it starts. Secondary prevention looks for early warning signs and intervenes before things get worse. Tertiary prevention comes after harm has happened, supporting victims, holding offenders to account, and trying to reduce reoffending. It is time that society, mainly institutions and work places are educated about this heinous crime. Homes, families, caregiving settings, and informal workplaces need special care because victims in these places can be isolated and the abuser often trusted. Schools should teach consent, empathy, and online safety. Workplaces and institutions must have clear safety rules, fair complaint systems, and independent reviews. Families should encourage children and vulnerable adults to speak up about uncomfortable behaviour without fear or blame. Domestic workers from economically poor background are often the victims and therefore, they should get emergency contacts, safe working conditions, transport support when needed, and trusted ways to report harassment, coercion, confinement, or assault. Communities must challenge ideas that excuse abuse, like blaming victims, celebrating macho violence, staying silent about harm, or trusting powerful people without question. Media and public campaigns should avoid sensationalism and instead explain how predatory behaviour typically works so people can recognise warning signs. Technology, especially the easy access through mobile phones, increases risks for children and other vulnerable users. Justice systems must use punishment when needed, but punishment alone cannot prevent abuse. Evidence shows some structured treatment programs can reduce reoffending, though results vary and must be used carefully. Predatory behaviour is not caused by psychology alone and cannot be stopped by law alone. It grows where risks, opportunity, weak accountability, harmful social norms, and vulnerable people come together. Effective prevention needs education, early warning systems, stronger safeguards, survivor support, bystander action, offender accountability, and rehabilitation programs that do not endanger public safety.
EDITOR PICKS
Reviewing visions
For more than two decades, Nagaland has not lacked vision documents. Since 2003, successive documents prepared by bureaucratic experts and policy planners have imagined a transformed state: agriculturally productive, economically self-reliant, bette...
