Divisive syndrome

In recent weeks, a spate of news reports based on statements from various Naga national groups has revealed a worrying pattern: deepening divisions within their ranks and even instances of physical altercations. These developments point to an undeniable reality-factionalism has become the mainstay of the so-called ‘Naga independence movement,’ or what is otherwise referred to as the Naga political movement or issue. What is most troubling about this continuing mitosis in factions is that these splits are not ideological. There has been no departure from the singular premise of political sovereignty as reaffirmed by the 1951 Plebiscite. Yet, from a single body to nearly 30 factions today, the movement has become a contradiction of its foundational ethos-a direct anti-thesis of the public referendum it claims to uphold. It is time to acknowledge the futility of clinging to beliefs founded on the insulated visions of a few leaders who were far removed from the rapidly evolving realities around them. Meanwhile, the people remain enchanted by the illusion of a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. For all their sincerity and emotional conviction, the people have, over time, shown little willingness to apply reason or logic to an ideology that is now little more than a lip service. In a politically surcharged environment, the polarizing challenge-“if you are not for us, you are against us”-takes deep root. Today, the factions are largely manned by individuals in their late 30s, who have little understanding of the big picture as many have been drawn in by a mix of desperation and circumstance. One of the contributing factors is the kind of elections replete with threats, coercion, bribery, and booth capturing which are routine and create a steady stream of conscripts. The principle of “might is right” still dominates the social fabric, demanding daredevils for operations, who-once unemployed or rudderless –show tendency to get absorbed into factional ranks wherever their services can be utilized. The unstoppable rise in the number of factions sends a stark and distressing message: the situation is symptomatic of long-standing damages to Naga society that remain unaddressed. Everyone wants to be a leader; no one wants to follow. This leadership syndrome-rooted more in ambition than accountability-has only deepened the chaos. Even a once vibrant and united Nagaland has lost its charm and its moto ‘unity’ appears a mockery as disintegration of society and rise of parallel authorities appear more explainable. There is much to be written about what has gone wrong. A meaningful beginning can only happen if society’s elders, leaders, and thinkers begin to examine the entire conundrum from a wider, more responsible perspective. The symptoms of a serious social ailment are all too visible, yet even those entrusted with the public mandate seem more inclined to serve their own interests than to pursue genuine remedies that society begs for application. This has to begin not at conclaves or at impressive programmes but from the heart, homes to institutes across society. The erosion of moral and ethical values is no longer an unfamiliar phenomenon, despite the oft-repeated declarations of uniqueness. Unless there is a unity of purpose -built on reason, ethics, and vision-the worst is yet to come. But by then, it may be too late.