Staff Reporter
DIMAPUR, JUN 27 (NPN): Convenor of WC, NNPGs N. Kitovi Zhimomi expounded on various issues related with demand for early solution to the Naga political issue and the consequences of lack of unison among NPGs for solution, growing frustration among youth, social unrest and also criticism to the tripartite agreement signed for oil exploration in the DABs.
Speaking to the media after the FUN rally at Agri Expo, WC NNPGs convener Kitovi Zhimomi said the “massive response” reflected strong public support for an urgent political solution and growing frustration among youth over delays despite the signing of the Framework Agreement (2015) and Agreed Position (2017).
He noted that the future of Naga youth appeared uncertain, but the turnout showed determination to fight for a better tomorrow. Zhimomi added that participation of both elderly citizens and youth, even under the scorching heat, demonstrated the people’s resolve to secure a brighter future for coming generations.
Zhimomi described Naga youth as the “real stakeholders” in the political issue since they will inherit the consequences of today’s decisions. He stressed their right to demand peace, development, and certainty for the future, noting civil society appeals had failed to secure implementation of agreements.
Responding to claims that he sponsored the Fed-Up Nagas movement, Zhimomi denied it, saying he was initially sceptical but later found the group sincere. “It is not sponsorship. We met at a crossroads because our aspirations matched,” he explained.
Zhimomi strongly opposed the reported MoU on oil exploration between Assam, Nagaland and the Centre, questioning who authorised the agreement. He argued that under the Agreed Position, ownership of land and resources belongs to the Naga people and should be decided by the proposed Nagaland Tatar Hoho.
Zhimomi said exploration must wait until the Assam-Nagaland boundary is settled, warning unilateral moves could spark tensions. Drawing parallels with the 16-Point Agreement, he cautioned against repeating past mistakes without wider Naga consultation.
Asked about reports linking veteran politician S.C. Jamir’s proposed attendance to NSCN (I-M)’s absence, Kitovi said he could not confirm the claim but recalled a similar 1997 incident when Jamir withdrew to avoid division, yet NSCN (I-M) still stayed away. He added that if the organisation cites Jamir as the reason again, it should publicly explain its position to the Naga people.
Zhimomi said both the Government of India and signatories of the agreement were ready for implementation, but “someone was blocking progress”. He urged identifying who was “playing a double game.” Backing the Fed-Up Nagas movement, he said its demands reflected ordinary Nagas’ aspirations for peace, development, and certainty. Zhimomi added that if youth demand food security and progress, no one should oppose them, stressing the turnout showed determination to fight for a better future.