Litmus test for agreements

Nagas find themselves at a critical juncture, grappling with profound socio-political frustration as the long-anticipated resolution to the Naga political issue remains elusive. Despite significant milestones, including the signing of the Framework Agreement in 2015 and the Agreed Position in 2017, the hopes of closing the chapter of political conflict so as to open a new chapter of peace, reconciliation and progress has been overshadowed by an inordinate delay, leaving a populace weary and disillusioned. This protracted stalemate, now stretching over 28 years since the second ceasefire in 1997, has not only fostered a sense of betrayal but has also ignited a renewed, fervent demand for immediate action from various segments of Naga society. The journey towards a lasting peace has been marked by a series of negotiations and agreements, yet each step forward seems to be met with subsequent stagnation. The ceasefire between the Government of India and NSCN (I-M) in 1997, followed by another with the GPRN/NSCN (U) in 2001, laid the groundwork for dialogue. However, the unilateral abrogation of the latter in 2015 by Khaplang, and a subsequent agreement by the breakaway Neokpao- Kitovi faction in 2012, underscored the complexities and internal divisions within the Naga political landscape. The Framework Agreement with NSCN (I-M) in 2015 and the Agreed Position with the Working Committee of the 7-member Naga National Political Groups (NNPGs) in 2017 were hailed as major breakthroughs, offering a glimmer of hope for a conclusive settlement. Yet, the declaration by then Interlocutor R.N. Ravi in July 2019 that negotiations would cease by October 31, 2019, and his subsequent statement to the Nagaland Legislative Assembly in February 2021 that talks had ended, further deepened the public’s scepticism and frustration. On the other hand, the state government, acting as a facilitator, continues to consistently appeal to the Government of India to conclude negotiations. This sentiment is amplified by numerous civil society organizations and community groups who see no reason for the unexplained delayed solution. The Nagaland GB Federation (NGBF), representing village chieftains and traditional leaders, has been a consistent grassroots mobilizer, organizing peace rallies and conventions to press for a resolution. Similarly, the Naga Common Platform (NCP) and the Nagaland People’s Action Committee (NPAC) have emerged as collaborative fronts, uniting public pressure to demand a final accord without further delay. The Central Nagaland Tribes Council (CNTC), the Naga Council Dimapur (NCD), and the Confederation of Nagaland Chamber of Commerce and Industries (CNCCI) and later, the Concerned Naga Forum of Nagaland (CNFN) have also voiced their concerns, highlighting the economic instability and the burden of multiple taxations imposed by armed groups due to the unresolved political issue. Perhaps most indicative of the growing disillusionment among youth, is the rise of the “Fed Up Nagas” (FUN) movement. This group has pitched its voice for urgent political solution.FUN is gradually emerging as a platform of youth epitomizing the frustration over decades of uncertainty. Their planned public rally, for June 27, 2026, in Dimapur, signals a strong demand for an immediate end to the prolonged political stalemate. The fatigue among citizens, coupled with concerns over parallel tax regimes, livelihood uncertainties, and a pervasive lack of political clarity, has created an environment where communities are left wondering about their future which has made them increasingly demanding a conclusive settlement. Too much time has passed and the future of the people hinges on an expeditious and just resolution that addresses the historical grievances and the contemporary aspirations of people, ensuring stability and progress for all.