DIMAPUR, OCT 28 (NPN):The Linguistic Minority Forum of Nagaland (LMFN) has expressed concern over a reported directive ordering the compulsory closure of shops on Sundays and the closure of business establishments owned or operated by non-Nagas. In a statement issued by its president, Bishnu Bhattarcharjee, the Forum urged the competent authorities to clarify the directive’s legal status, scope and implementation while safeguarding the rights and livelihoods of long-settled residents.
The LMFN issued the statement in the context of a notification dated October 23, 2026, attributed to the Ministry of Information and Publicity of the NSCN/Federal Republic Government of Nagaland (FRGN), which reportedly announced the directives.
The forum expressed solidarity with concerns raised earlier by the Naga Council Dimapur, CNCCI, DMC, EDTC, the Deputy Commissioner of Dimapur, DUCCF, DCCI and other civil society organisations. It said the proposed phased closure of businesses owned by non-Nagas could have serious implications for peaceful coexistence and the state’s economic environment.
The LMFN reiterated its respect for the distinct identity, traditions, faith and economic aspirations of the Naga people. At the same time, it maintained that permanent non-Naga residents, particularly long-established linguistic minorities who had contributed to Nagaland’s social and economic development for generations, deserved fair consideration, protection of their legitimate interests and constructive engagement.
The Forum said the reported directive raised questions regarding its legal status, authority and proposed implementation.
It noted that Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution could be relevant to equality before the law and the freedom to practise a profession or carry on any lawful trade or business, subject to constitutional restrictions. Depending on the circumstances, Articles 21 and 300A could also have implications for personal liberty and property rights.
Recognising Nagaland’s special constitutional framework under Article 371A, the LMFN said the precise legal implications of the directive would depend on its nature, the authority under which it was issued, the applicable laws and the circumstances of its implementation. It called for a careful assessment of the relevant facts and legal provisions without prejudging the issues involved.
Highlighting the possible economic consequences, the Forum said Dimapur’s business environment was already challenging, with many traders struggling to sustain their livelihoods. It warned that uncertainty over the continued operation of established businesses could affect employment, household incomes and the wider economy, while creating apprehension among communities and placing avoidable strain on social harmony.
LMFN further cautioned that any notification threatening business closures or curtailing citizens’ lawful rights could create fear and uncertainty, disrupt market activities and adversely affect businesses, workers and consumers across Nagaland. It said the economy was interconnected and that every community contributed to the state’s overall economic well-being.
According to the Forum, promoting indigenous entrepreneurship and protecting the economic interests of the Naga people were important objectives that could be pursued through constructive policies, fair opportunities and meaningful dialogue.
However, it said such efforts should also take into account the livelihoods and lawful business interests of long-settled residents.
Any measure affecting business operations or ownership, it maintained, must conform to the applicable constitutional and legal framework and should not result in unlawful discrimination on racial or ethnic grounds.
LMFN urged the government, indigenous organisations, business associations and representatives of affected communities to engage in constructive dialogue and ensure that any measures concerning business establishments were implemented in accordance with applicable laws and due procedure.
It also appealed to the chief minister, home minister, governor, chief secretary and director general of police to take appropriate measures within their constitutional and legal mandates to safeguard the security and well-being of non-Naga Indian citizens and long-settled residents.
Reaffirming its commitment to peaceful dialogue, mutual respect and harmonious coexistence, the Forum said the spirit of “Unity in Diversity with Dignity” should remain central to Nagaland’s social harmony and inclusive development. It added that the aspirations of indigenous communities and the legitimate concerns of permanent non-Naga settlers could be addressed through a balanced approach promoting mutual understanding, economic stability and public confidence.
