Looking or working

One of the most pressing challenges confronting Nagaland is how to provide a meaningful economic future for its younger generation, particularly Generation Z, who are entering adulthood with education and aspirations but very limited employment opportunities. The unemployment situation is particularly disturbing, with Nagaland recording one of the highest rates in the North East. According to figures presented by the Chief Secretary, citing the March 2026 Periodic Labour Force Survey, unemployment among those aged 15-29 stood at 17.5 per cent, against the national average of 9.9 per cent. This is not merely an economic statistic but a warning about the consequences of allowing an entire generation to remain frustrated and economically dependent. For decades, government employment has remained the preferred destination for educated Naga youth. This preference is understandable in a state where private enterprise remains underdeveloped, the market is limited and employment outside government establishments offers little security. However, government recruitment cannot absorb the growing number of educated job seekers. The Chief Secretary’s observation that only 589 persons were recruited through the NPSC and NSSB in 2025 underlines the widening gap between expectations and opportunities. The government has introduced several central and state-sponsored schemes to promote entrepreneurship, skill development, agriculture and self-employment. Yet the real question is whether these initiatives are creating sustainable livelihoods or merely facilitating the distribution of loans and subsidies. Entrepreneurship cannot flourish through financial assistance alone. Nagaland’s difficult terrain, inadequate road connectivity, unreliable infrastructure, limited access to markets and rampant collections continue to discourage private investment. The state must therefore identify economic activities that suit its geography, climate, resources and relatively small market. Horticulture offers one of the strongest possibilities. However, production without assured markets, storage, processing and transportation will only leave farmers with unsold produce. Recent government initiatives involving private partners for pineapple cultivation, value addition and market linkages point in the right direction. Floriculture also deserves greater attention, particularly around Kohima, Dimapur and other urban centres. Flowers have commercial potential through weddings, religious functions, hotels, landscaping and institutional demand. However, production must be linked to regular buyers and distribution networks rather than confined to exhibitions and seasonal festivals. Tourism presents another opportunity, especially through low-investment, community-owned ventures. Homestays, camping sites, nature trails, village experiences, local food outlets and adventure activities can generate income without requiring expensive hotels or large infrastructure. Nagaland’s landscape, biodiversity and cultural heritage provide a natural advantage. However, poor roads, sanitation, transport facilities and erratic power can undermine even the most attractive destinations. Tourism cannot be promoted through publicity alone; visitors must have a safe and dependable experience. The best approach, therefore, is not to choose one sector but to integrate all three. A horticulture farm can become an agro-tourism destination, floriculture can complement homestays and local produce can supply restaurants and hospitality businesses. This creates multiple income streams while keeping economic benefits within communities. What Nagaland needs now is a shift from scheme-driven administration to market-driven development. The government must identify viable opportunities district-wise, provide technical training, facilitate credit, connect producers with buyers and ensure transparent implementation. It must also confront extortion, illegal taxation and other practices that increase the cost of doing business. The real measure of government commitment will not be the number of beneficiaries enrolled but the number of sustainable enterprises created and jobs generated. Nagaland cannot afford to let its most educated generation become its most economically frustrated.