The much-anticipated repair work on the road over bridge near DDSC stadium here commenced on Tuesday. According to construction manager Litangba Sangtam, the project would include two spans, covering the barricade wall and footpath.
The project under the Public Works Department National Highway Division is being implemented at an estimated cost of Rs 2.68 crore, with demolition expenses pegged around Rs 1.50 lakh.
Initially planned for six months, the project’s timeline has been shortened to three months following administrative directives. Acknowledging the challenges in meeting the shortened deadline due to the need for concrete curing time, Sangtam however assured that work would continue day and night, including Sundays, to meet the deadline. But, he added that there was no guarantee that the bridge would be fully operational within that timeframe.
He said the repair was limited to two spans of the bridge, totaling 15 metre in length and seven metre in width, with an additional two metre for the footpath.
He disclosed that although the initial plan was to repair the entire bridge, a departmental survey led to the decision to focus on these two spans.
He mentioned that a significant technical issue faced by the team was the presence of a residential house below the bridge, raising concern over its possible damage during the demolition, adding that the matter had been forwarded to the administration for further consideration.
Meanwhile, some commuters expressed dissatisfaction with the timing of the repair work, noting that it started just before the festive season. Many also raised questions regarding the efficiency of the PWD and the state government.
Sharing his frustration over the possible impact of the repair work on his daily income, he feared that there could be a sharp decline in passengers.
Interestingly, the owner of the house beneath the bridge voiced support for the project, recognizing its public importance.
While hopeful that the repair would not damage his property, he expressed concerns over the lack of compensation for potential damage. He mentioned that although he was willing to handle minor damage, he expected compensation for any significant damage to his property.