SC raps Rahul Gandhi for remarks on army

If you are a true Indian, you wouldn’t say such a thing, the Supreme Court on Monday said as it censured Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over his alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during his Bharat Jodo Yatra.
The top court, however, stayed the proceedings initiated in the matter against Gandhi before a Lucknow court.
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government and the complainant in the case.
“You are leader of opposition. Why don’t you say things in Parliament, why do you have to say it on social media?” the bench asked.
The top court continued, “How do you get to know that 2,000 sq km of Indian territory has been occupied by Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material?”
The bench further asked, “Why do you make these statements without having any material? If you are a true Indian, you won’t say such a thing.”
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Gandhi, submitted if the leader of opposition cannot raise issues, it would be an unfortunate situation.
“If he can’t say these things which are published in the Press, then he can’t be a leader of opposition,” Singhvi submitted.
On the bench’s true Indian remark, Singhvi replied,” It is also possible that a true Indian will say that our 20 Indian soldiers were beaten up and killed. This it is also a matter of concern.”
The top court then said, “When there is a conflict across the border, is it unusual to have casualties on either sides?”
Singhvi said Gandhi was only on the point of proper disclosure and raising concerns about the suppression of information.
Justice Datta said being a responsible leader of opposition, Gandhi ought not have done it as there was a proper forum to raise such questions.
While agreeing that Gandhi could have made the comments in a better manner, Singhvi said the complaint was nothing but an attempt to harass the petitioner.
Singhvi referred to Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and said a prior hearing of the accused was mandatory before the court took cognisance of a criminal complaint, which was not done in the present case.
The top court then issued notice on the plea while seeking response in three weeks and stayed the proceedings in the Lucknow trial court.
The Allahabad High Court on May 29 dismissed Gandhi’s plea.
Gandhi challenged the summoning order and the complaint arguing that it was motivated and lodged in mala fide manner.
In his plea filed in a court, complainant Udai Shanker Srivastava alleged during the December 2022 Yatra, Gandhi made several derogatory remarks about the Indian Army in context of the conflict with Chinese soldiers.
The lower court then summoned Gandhi as an accused for facing trial.
Gandhi’s advocate Pranshu Agarwal had argued that the allegations appeared to be fabricated just by reading the complaint.
It was also argued that Gandhi is not a resident of Lucknow, so before summoning him on this complaint, the subordinate court should have investigated the veracity of the allegations and he should have been summoned only if the allegations were prima-facie found to be fit for trial.